Enough or Too Many? In 2005, we saw marketers appear like popcorn. Everywhere you looked, someone had a product over DXInOne. Everyone seemed to suddenly know the system, and they are more than ready to explain it to you: for a price, or for free, through audio/video-based training, through Adobe documents, through support forums You name it. Training everywhere. Doesnt make much sense If there are so many training systems out there, then why arent enough reserves appearing to keep things smooth? Surely there should be a constant enough feed of fresh funds. There must be something else happening, right? You are right. There is more to it than just the basic act of shepherding folks through the system. If it WAS that simple, then there wouldnt be any problems with system volatility. Everything would be flowing along just fine. All right. Sit back and mull that one over and it shouldnt take you long to peg on it: Maybe its about just WHAT exactly the marketing sites are training over. Its what the marketing sites ARE training, on the whole. They are teaching their adherents, mainly, that this is a cash production system. Namely, that everyone is supposed to be able to just add a few bucks, and forever make relatively consistent withdrawals. They arent just saying sometimes it works that way, (if) or (when) etc. And sometimes it works another way, (if) or (when) etc. They are just plain telling you that you can add a few dollars and keep pulling out more and more as you go. At all times, mainly. No matter what is happening with system reserves. Think of the biggest training systems during 2005, and think about what their training has been like. We dont mean their marketing pages sure, everyone tends to market for best image. As far as that goes, marketing is marketing. But marketing HAS TO BE counter-balanced by quality training. You have to be ready to be flexible in this system; to understand that the system is dynamic, and doesnt just operate one way only. In short, when is it possible to withdraw more than you put in? When the system is being marketed hard enough to drive more total e-currency/currency through the system than DXG in circulation. During THOSE times, were seeing excess reserves, which over 2005 were drained. Again, this issue existed also by the end of 2003, when we had to correct for that imbalance as well. How it worked in 2005 During 2005, this is inevitably how it worked: Many new members got in. And many older (senior) members already had cash in the system. Since everyone could buy digots using old DXG directly to create new DXG, they surely did! And what did they do with the cash they got from OutXchanges? You guessed it; they basically pocketed that cash. They withdrew real money (reserves) consistently, while simultaneously creating more DXG by using their old DXG. In effect, many who had little funds to work with put funds through the system, and the system allowed those who were already vested to higher levels to extract that money. I still remember Sharon Toberer excitedly talking about purchasing her husband a $10,000 electric car for his birthday, from DXG profits, because she thought it was cute. Where do you think she got the $10,000 ? She had put some money (about $4000) in the system already. She was vested. When someone InXchanged $10,000 and it arrived in her account (this is just an example of the sort of usual thing that happened), she chose to cash that money out, and go on vacation, or make a purchase for the fun of it, or pay bills, etc. In this case, she bought an electric car (if I am remembering it correctly). Additional DXG Since she and so many of us were able to create a lot of additional DXG without having to add additional funds, it really was simply a matter of who had the most DXG. Those with the most DXG got to cash out the highest proportion of funds added to the system over time. We have had folks who retired for a full year already. They were retiring back in 2004 from the activity we were kicking up that year. Money came out of this system as fast as it went in, basically. For every 15 folks who added $1000 each, there was someone who could list DXG for OutXchanges for $15,000 worth of monthly profits ($15,000 new DXG created by using old DXG to pay fees). The DXInOne System allowed for this, and creating an imbalance could be expected, if training systems did not do their job to help folks understand how to balance. That much was always on our own shoulders, as trainers. During 2005, no one really HAD to InXchange funds consistently. There was really no requirement for ensuring cashflow throughout the system. Here is the problem, though Back in early 2005 (even late 2004), a number of larger marketers discovered, to their delight, that they could put some cash into the system, and start withdrawing larger amounts over and over. They went crazy feeling that they had basically discovered the holy grail, or the internets hottest unknown business, why buy training when you can get it all here for free? etc. Youve seen all the slogans from numerous sites. The problem Though there were enough marketers, they were sharing lousy training. All they ultimately taught their members was that they could put small amounts of money into the DXSystem, and keep withdrawing larger and still larger amounts. No sense of limitations. No bigger picture. No actual explanation of system cycles. No sense of how things worked. No description of what happens to money you InXchange. Just a basic marketing message, to sell courses. Hard and fast. The result was exactly what you would think very many members brought into the system, with a wrong sense of objectives and of their job here at DXInOne. Most of them PUT perhaps $500 in. And over the next few months, got started withdrawing pretty consistently. They took their $500 back out as quickly as they could. And as much more as they could, for the most part. Maybe 85% of DXUsers generally were in the simple habit of withdrawing the entire time. Plenty of marketing. But most everyone being taught not nearly enough about system reserves balance techniques or needs just how to use old DXG to create new DXG while constantly withdrawing reserves added by other members in the meantime, keeping total reserves low. The moral of the story Whats the moral of the story? Pretty simple, according to the Big Reserves Drain of 2005! Hard-core marketing can't replace quality training over DXInOne. One can't simplify DXInOne to basic push button standards and make the claim that you can simply sit around and produce cash out of thin air without borders or boundaries. Yet thats exactly what went wrong. Too many marketers; not enough [real] trainers. In the next issue, well talk about Marketing Vs. Fluidity: which comes first the chicken or the egg? |
