cool-sites-net.com
Home :> About Us :> Add Url :> Privacy Policy :> Terms of Use :> Add Your Article
Search:   
Add URL
 

Recreation & Entertainment

Society & Issues

Health & Hygiene

Finance & Banking

Food & Recipe

Careers & Employment

Teens & Children

Medical Care

Garden & Home

Realty & Property

Fashion & Relationships

Automotive

Shopping Online

Outdoor & Sports

Research & Science

Politics & Government

Events & News

Education & Reference

Business & Commerce

Hotels & Travel

Indoor Games

Self Healing

Internet & Computers

Art & Culture

 

Home › Events & News › Spirituality & Religion
 

Why Christian and Atheist Libertarians Get Along

 

Author: Kenn Gividen

Im the most religious guy in the Libertarian Party. At least thats what my friend, Charlie, decided. I dont know if his bit of insight was meant to be a compliment or a mere observation. Either way, I suppose there are others more deserving.

For his part, Charlie is a declared atheist. And, therein lays a dilemma for some libertarians. How can I a certified, card-carrying Bible thumper stand shoulder to shoulder with a guy whos never thumped a Bible in his life?

In spite of ourselves

One may assume there is a dtente in which the discussion of religion is avoided like a trip to the dentist. One would be wrong. I find few things more intellectually stimulating than a lively spat with a well-informed atheist particularly when feeble attempts are made to defend the untenable; eg, evolution.

Or, one may assume there is a level of irreconcilable toleration. Not so. Some of the best Christians I know are atheists. By that, I mean, atheists usually surpass Christians in areas such as morality, decency and human kindness. I dont tolerate these people. I like them. I enjoy their company. Id rather hang out with a crowd of honest atheists than a church full of back-stabbing Baptists any day of the week, including Sunday.

So why do libertarian Christians and atheists get along?

Exclusion doesnt work

The answer can be found in the word, inclusion. Think about it.

When Protestants control a government say Northern Ireland, for example Catholics and other non-Protestants have a tough way to go. And when Catholics take charge as in Ireland Protestants find themselves on the outside looking in.

Come to think of it, when any religious group takes control, all others face dire consequences. Consider the history of England. Bloody Mary had at least 275 Protestants burned at the stake (including the Archbishop of Canterbury) during her brief five-year term as Queen of England. A century later, Protestant Elizabeth I was executing Catholics. For their part, Muslims have a history of killing both Protestants and Catholics, not to mention Jews.

Life, some think, would be simpler if not safer if no religious sect controlled government. Lets put atheists in charge, they say. That would end sectarian bloodletting.

The inherent problem with atheists at the helm of government can be seen by recounting life under the rule of French atheist Maximilien Robespierre. More than a century after Queen Elizabeth executed Catholics, and 200 years after Bloody Mary was being bloody, Robespierre was sending thousands to the guillotine. The atheistic government of Joseph Stalin killed millions and Pol Pots Khmer Rouge slaughtered hundreds of thousands.

Protestants, Catholics, Muslims and atheists have one thing in common: When any sectarian group controls government, people die. Yet that was the norm of world history until the 17th century.

A place at the table

Perhaps the most momentous day in American history was February 5, 1631 when a free-thinking British preacher named Roger Williams alit from a ship in Bostons harbor. Williams purchased land from the Indians and founded a community that became Rhode Island. Unlike the other colonies, Rhode Island separated civil and ecclesiastical governments. No sect would control government. Rather, all would have a place at the table.

Williams philosophy of religious liberty was perceived to be an invitation to disaster. But the anticipated quarreling among the sects never materialized. In fact, the arrangement resulted in religious harmony. No religious institution felt threatened by any other, for all were free to believe (or not believe) as they pleased. There was no reason to burn your neighbors at the stake for having too many holes in their sleeves.

And that takes us back to the original question.

Why do Libertarians Christians, atheists and other sectarians manage to get along? The answer is simple. Like Williams, we understand the principle of inclusion. Everyone has a place at the table. And so, I can relish the thought of being the most religious guy in the Libertarian Party without fear of Charlie sending me to the gulag. Erstwhile, my Christian friends will continue to call me the most libertarian guy in the Baptist church.

###

Author Bio:
Kenn Gividen is an authority in this industry. Kenn has written several articles in the past on this subject.
You can also reach this article by using: religious news, religious issues, religious social issues, religious product news
 
 
 

Related Articles

 
Your Marketing Arsenal Must Include RSS
 
Netanyahu: Too Late For A Fight-back?
 
What the Heck is RSS?
 
The Michael Savage Phenomenon
 
Women are More Powerful
 
Traffic Congestion is Bad and Fuel Prices Too High; Lance Rants
 
The Canadian Political System
 
A 60s Fancy Dress
 
Conveyor Screws
 
The Good and the Bad James Boys: Frank, Jesse, Henry, & William
 
 
 
 
 

Lance Rants about Blaming the US for Muslim Hate on Western World

There are some in the Western World who actually believe the Al Jazeera rhetoric claiming that the U ... - Lance Winslow
 

Authenticity Of Vastu (Science of Indian architecture)

Vastu is one of the most ancient sciences of Indian architecture and is composed of specific rules, ... - Nitin Parmar
 

Israel Termed A 'Nuclear Power' By US Officials

Two non-senior US officials indirectly called on Israel to start planning on cancelling its nuclear ... - Angelique Van Engelen
 
 

Fielding's Education of Readers in "Tom Jones," Part Four

This is part four of an essay on Henry Fielding's narrative technique in "Tom Jones." - Mary Arnold
 

3 Free Basketball Picks 1/8/06: New York To Win Wild One

The Knicks home games have been completely high scoring. Their matchup against the Sonics should be ... - David Pincus
 
 
Home :> Privacy Policy :> Terms of Use  
Copyright © www.coolsitesnet.com - All Rights Reserved Worldwide.